WG - Lidar - Bathymetry - Public

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

I'm happy to contribute.

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

Nick,

I am not getting to any wiki page form the link you sent. Here is what I get on GitHub:

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

Hi Qassim, 

I think a comma go attached to the address in Nick's original post. You should be able to access the wiki from here:

https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki

Danial

Nick,

I am not getting to any wiki page form the link you sent. Here is what I get on GitHub:

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

Hi Qassim, 

I think a comma go attached to the address in Nick's original post. You should be able to access the wiki from here:

https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki

Danial

Nick,

I am not getting to any wiki page form the link you sent. Here is what I get on GitHub:

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

Looking at 10am central on the 24th and 26th of Sept. Just opened the conversation with ASPRS on the best way to manage the meetings of sub-groups. Stay tuned.

Let's use this page to exchange ideas until then!

What are people looking for exactly?
-Recommended items to be in a calibration report? 
-Methods for different collects for data validation? How different is this from acoustic collects?
-Tpu validation practices? How different is this from system validation? What limitations do we have?

How often does this group need to meet? I was thinking every other week.
-Depends on short and long terms goals / support.
-Do we split and tackle or work in a linear process?

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

Will need to slide this one week to the right. Looking at Oct 3rd 10am. Will post early next week the meeting info here but not on LinkedIn. I'll also work with Xan to grab some regular scheduled group meeting time to chat items outside of this effort and will hope a few more who have expressed interest join from there to support sub-group efforts.

Ya'll have a great weekend!

Looking at 10am central on the 24th and 26th of Sept. Just opened the conversation with ASPRS on the best way to manage the meetings of sub-groups. Stay tuned.

Let's use this page to exchange ideas until then!

What are people looking for exactly?
-Recommended items to be in a calibration report? 
-Methods for different collects for data validation? How different is this from acoustic collects?
-Tpu validation practices? How different is this from system validation? What limitations do we have?

How often does this group need to meet? I was thinking every other week.
-Depends on short and long terms goals / support.
-Do we split and tackle or work in a linear process?

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

I hope everyone has a great weekend and for anyone in the eye of the passing storm, I hope the best with recovery. 

I have asked for Oct 3rd at 1300 central for a time slot and will leave that for an hour. As soon as I here confirmation from ASPRS, I'll share the link here in this thread. For those that have raised a hand or who see the community exchanges and would like to join, please do, and we can discuss how to best manage a sub-group on this initial bathy lidar calibration practices call. 

Will need to slide this one week to the right. Looking at Oct 3rd 10am. Will post early next week the meeting info here but not on LinkedIn. I'll also work with Xan to grab some regular scheduled group meeting time to chat items outside of this effort and will hope a few more who have expressed interest join from there to support sub-group efforts.

Ya'll have a great weekend!

Looking at 10am central on the 24th and 26th of Sept. Just opened the conversation with ASPRS on the best way to manage the meetings of sub-groups. Stay tuned.

Let's use this page to exchange ideas until then!

What are people looking for exactly?
-Recommended items to be in a calibration report? 
-Methods for different collects for data validation? How different is this from acoustic collects?
-Tpu validation practices? How different is this from system validation? What limitations do we have?

How often does this group need to meet? I was thinking every other week.
-Depends on short and long terms goals / support.
-Do we split and tackle or work in a linear process?

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

------------------------------
Nicholas Johnson
Physical Scientist
USACE
Kiln MS
------------------------------

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

Hey Everyone! Apologies for the confusion with the meeting and then the late calendar add. For those that have responded in this discussion as interested in a calibration guideline / reporting best practice for our wiki, or for those that do want to join, how does every other Thur 10am central starting on Oct 31st sound? 
I need this meeting setup by ASPRS then I can add an event to our community calendar. I don't mind anyone listening in but for those that wanted to contribute I would like to know if 10am on Thurs works for a majority of us. 
Would anyone be interested in helping me with these should I not be able to attend any one meeting?

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

Hey Everyone! Apologies for the confusion with the meeting and then the late calendar add. For those that have responded in this discussion as interested in a calibration guideline / reporting best practice for our wiki, or for those that do want to join, how does every other Thur 10am central starting on Oct 31st sound? 
I need this meeting setup by ASPRS then I can add an event to our community calendar. I don't mind anyone listening in but for those that wanted to contribute I would like to know if 10am on Thurs works for a majority of us. 
Would anyone be interested in helping me with these should I not be able to attend any one meeting?

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

------------------------------
Nicholas Johnson
Physical Scientist
USACE
Kiln MS
------------------------------

All,

Until we meet, maybe have a little fun and add comments to the "CHAT GPT - Bathy Lidar Cal - fun" google doc at ,https://docs.google.com/document/d/18dbL5pwOyUtwZWt2kpUlu0-uDwxU7xUHXH3KRN9lOh8/edit?usp=drive_link, which you can get to through our community pages via the library tab. I shared some other spec and cal documents that are good resources in the same directory. I asked CHAT GPT for what a bathy lidar calibration should include and was surprised. I did ask again if it should have a few items I thought should be and then slapped those two answers together. 

See who ever can join on Oct 31st, time pending. I'll try to have the info posted at least a week a ahead of time.

------------------------------
Nicholas Johnson
Physical Scientist
USACE
Kiln MS

Original Message:
Sent: 08-29-2024 01:26 PM
From: Mr. Nicholas Johnson
Subject: Vertical Uncertainty-Accuracy, Calibration to processing to validation - sub-group

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

------------------------------
Nicholas Johnson
Physical Scientist
USACE
Kiln MS
------------------------------

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

------------------------------
Nicholas Johnson
Physical Scientist
USACE
Kiln MS
------------------------------

A smaller group today but coming off an awesome week at the JALBTCX workshop, not that bad. 

I've asked those that attended to check out Lockhart_TPU and ChatGPT docs through our resources-drive link under the Examples-Specs directory for our next call to discuss accuracy and precision metrics and calibration practices. Feel free to mark up the ChatGPT Calibration Report example.

I did mention index of refraction for the calibration as well as the processing reports as something I'd like to be more open. James Dietrich shared some resources and I've added Parrish's OSU resource as well. I would need Teledyne's permission to share the specific value so for now, JALBTCX's reports will just state the category selected " saline".

https://github.com/geojames/global_refractive_index_532" href="https://github.com/geojames/global_refractive_index_532" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" class="fui-Link ___1q1shib f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1s184ao f1mk8lai fnbmjn9 f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="https://github.com/geojames/global_refractive_index_532">https://github.com/geojames/global_refractive_index_532

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUqlqw-NWk0" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUqlqw-NWk0" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" class="fui-Link ___1q1shib f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1s184ao f1mk8lai fnbmjn9 f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuqlqw-nwk0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUqlqw-NWk0

https://research.engr.oregonstate.edu/parrish/index-refraction-seawater-and-freshwater-function-wavelength-and-temperature" href="https://research.engr.oregonstate.edu/parrish/index-refraction-seawater-and-freshwater-function-wavelength-and-temperature" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" class="fui-Link ___1q1shib f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1s184ao f1mk8lai fnbmjn9 f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="https://research.engr.oregonstate.edu/parrish/index-refraction-seawater-and-freshwater-function-wavelength-and-temperature">https://research.engr.oregonstate.edu/parrish/index-refraction-seawater-and-freshwater-function-wavelength-and-temperature

Our next meeting will be in two weeks, same time. I apologize for the Event time mix up as it is to be at 10am central.

Topic: Bathy Sub Working Group - Calibration Best Practice Effort Meeting

When:  Nov 14, 2024 from 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM (CT)

        Every 14 days, until Feb 20, 2025, 9 occurrence(s)

Please download and import the following iCalendar (.ics) files to your calendar system.

Daily: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/tZEvcOqvpjojG9yxVAD52iJHvgobaIY0lPKq/ics?icsToken=98tyKuGtrDwpHdyUuRiPRpwMAI_Cb-3xiH5EjfpEhCnEJ3UBayneIOVNMLNWKYjc&meetingMasterEventId=fs175XdoSv-FYp0cJzAeZg

Join Zoom Meeting

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85273781918?pwd=0jNc46wBrPh4m25xTk2hsseo13G5kh.1

Meeting ID: 852 7378 1918

Passcode: 978137

---

One tap mobile

+16465588656,,85273781918# US (New York)

+16469313860,,85273781918# US

------------------------------
Nicholas Johnson
Physical Scientist
USACE
Kiln MS

Original Message:
Sent: 08-29-2024 01:26 PM
From: Mr. Nicholas Johnson
Subject: Vertical Uncertainty-Accuracy, Calibration to processing to validation - sub-group

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

------------------------------
Nicholas Johnson
Physical Scientist
USACE
Kiln MS
------------------------------

I corrected my last comment as I copied the event details from my email with ASPRS when setting up a reoccurring meeting which had the date from our last meeting. Next calibration conversation will be When:  Nov 14, 2024 from 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM (CT). See our events page.

A smaller group today but coming off an awesome week at the JALBTCX workshop, not that bad. 

I've asked those that attended to check out Lockhart_TPU and ChatGPT docs through our resources-drive link under the Examples-Specs directory for our next call to discuss accuracy and precision metrics and calibration practices. Feel free to mark up the ChatGPT Calibration Report example.

I did mention index of refraction for the calibration as well as the processing reports as something I'd like to be more open. James Dietrich shared some resources and I've added Parrish's OSU resource as well. I would need Teledyne's permission to share the specific value so for now, JALBTCX's reports will just state the category selected " saline".

https://github.com/geojames/global_refractive_index_532" href="https://github.com/geojames/global_refractive_index_532" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" class="fui-Link ___1q1shib f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1s184ao f1mk8lai fnbmjn9 f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="https://github.com/geojames/global_refractive_index_532">https://github.com/geojames/global_refractive_index_532

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUqlqw-NWk0" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUqlqw-NWk0" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" class="fui-Link ___1q1shib f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1s184ao f1mk8lai fnbmjn9 f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuqlqw-nwk0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUqlqw-NWk0

https://research.engr.oregonstate.edu/parrish/index-refraction-seawater-and-freshwater-function-wavelength-and-temperature" href="https://research.engr.oregonstate.edu/parrish/index-refraction-seawater-and-freshwater-function-wavelength-and-temperature" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" class="fui-Link ___1q1shib f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1s184ao f1mk8lai fnbmjn9 f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="https://research.engr.oregonstate.edu/parrish/index-refraction-seawater-and-freshwater-function-wavelength-and-temperature">https://research.engr.oregonstate.edu/parrish/index-refraction-seawater-and-freshwater-function-wavelength-and-temperature

Our next meeting will be in two weeks, same time. I apologize for the Event time mix up as it is to be at 10am central.

Topic: Bathy Sub Working Group - Calibration Best Practice Effort Meeting

When:  Nov 14, 2024 from 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM (CT)

        Every 14 days, until Feb 20, 2025, 9 occurrence(s)

Please download and import the following iCalendar (.ics) files to your calendar system.

Daily: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/tZEvcOqvpjojG9yxVAD52iJHvgobaIY0lPKq/ics?icsToken=98tyKuGtrDwpHdyUuRiPRpwMAI_Cb-3xiH5EjfpEhCnEJ3UBayneIOVNMLNWKYjc&meetingMasterEventId=fs175XdoSv-FYp0cJzAeZg

Join Zoom Meeting

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85273781918?pwd=0jNc46wBrPh4m25xTk2hsseo13G5kh.1

Meeting ID: 852 7378 1918

Passcode: 978137

---

One tap mobile

+16465588656,,85273781918# US (New York)

+16469313860,,85273781918# US

------------------------------
Nicholas Johnson
Physical Scientist
USACE
Kiln MS

Original Message:
Sent: 08-29-2024 01:26 PM
From: Mr. Nicholas Johnson
Subject: Vertical Uncertainty-Accuracy, Calibration to processing to validation - sub-group

I'd like to start our first working sub-group on vertical accuracy. I presented today on a user focused, simplification practice approach to supporting the much requested data validation practice request, specifically towards the vertical component. It seems everyone is in agreement that the role ASPRS plays here is to support the profession by addressing the vertical accuracy concerns ,at first, in a concise and digestible fashion. I presented the wiki, https://github.com/ASPRSorg/BWG/wiki, as a place this information, once publicly reviewed, will live until the practice has reached a point where they are promoted to an addendum to the other ASPRS Guidelines. Thanks to all that attended. I look forward to learning from users and other professionals on this specific effort.  

Please comment to this thread if you would like to join the group and hopefully we could meet at the end of September to discuss needs, goals, and timelines for working. If you aren't well know to the bathy lidar world, please feel free to share a little info about your specific interest in this topic, vertical uncertainty/calibration/processing practices.

------------------------------
Nicholas Johnson
Physical Scientist
USACE
Kiln MS
------------------------------